Which of the following is a metacognitive strategy?

The choice of summarizing information after reading is a metacognitive strategy because it involves reflecting on understanding and actively engaging with the material. This strategy encourages learners to process information at a deeper level by integrating what they’ve read, evaluating its significance, and clarifying their own comprehension of concepts. Through summarization, learners can identify gaps in their understanding, which enables them to take steps to address these gaps and enhance their learning.

Metacognition encompasses awareness and control of one’s own thinking and learning processes. Summarizing aids in self-monitoring how well the information has been absorbed and retained, allowing learners to adjust their study techniques accordingly. This reflective practice supports improved retention and comprehension, making it an effective metacognitive tool.

In contrast, creating a study group with peers can enhance learning through collaboration, but it does not inherently involve self-regulation of one's thinking processes. Memorizing facts focuses on rote learning, which does not require reflection or evaluation of one’s understanding. Reading without taking notes often leads to passive engagement with the material, missing the opportunity for active processing and self-assessment. Therefore, summarizing is the only strategy mentioned that fully exemplifies metacognitive awareness and regulation.